Monday, July 29, 2019

IRS has begun sending letters to virtual currency owners advising them to pay back taxes and/or file amended returns

In IR-2019-132, July 26, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service has begun sending letters to taxpayers with virtual currency transactions that potentially failed to report income and pay the resulting tax from virtual currency transactions or did not report their transactions properly.
"Taxpayers should take these letters very seriously by reviewing their tax filings and when appropriate, amend past returns and pay back taxes, interest and penalties," said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. "The IRS is expanding our efforts involving virtual currency, including increased use of data analytics. We are focused on enforcing the law and helping taxpayers fully understand and meet their obligations."
The IRS started sending theeducational letters” to taxpayers last week. By the end of August, more than 10,000 taxpayers will receive these letters.
For taxpayers receiving an educational letter it purpose is to help taxpayers understand their tax and filing obligations and how to correct past errors.
Last year the IRS announced a Virtual Currency Compliance campaign to address tax noncompliance related to the use of virtual currency through outreach and examinations of taxpayers. The IRS will remain actively engaged in addressing non-compliance related to virtual currency transactions through a variety of efforts, ranging from taxpayer education to audits to criminal investigations.
Virtual currency is an ongoing focus area for IRS Criminal Investigation.
IRS Notice 2014-21 states that virtual currency is property for federal tax purposes and provides guidance on how general federal tax principles apply to virtual currency transactions. Compliance efforts follow these general tax principles. The IRS will continue to consider and solicit taxpayer and practitioner feedback in education efforts and future guidance.
Taxpayers who do not properly report the income tax consequences of virtual currency transactions are, when appropriate, liable for tax, penalties and interest. In some cases, taxpayers could be subject to criminal prosecution.


Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Advance Payment for Goods--Reg. 1.451-5 Removed by TD 9870


Prior to the TCJA, Reg. §1.451-5 provided special rules for advanced payment for goods and long term contracts. These rules were superseded by revised IRC §451(c). The prior regulations implementing IRC §451 allowed taxpayers generally to defer the recognition of advance payment for goods until the tax year in which the payments were properly accruable under the taxpayer's method of accounting for tax purposes if that method results in the payments being included in gross income no later than when they are includible in gross receipts under the taxpayer's method of accounting for financial reporting purposes.[1]

Revised IRC §451(c) and its election to defer advance payments removed the deferral method provided by Reg. §1.451-5.[2] On July 15, 2019 the Treasury issued T.D. 9870 and removed Reg. §1.451-5 and its cross references. Removing Reg. §1.451-5 ensures that the new deferral rules of IRC §451(c) apply uniformly and consistently to all taxpayers and simplifies tax administration. The rules of IRC §446 regarding changes in methods of accounting apply to taxpayers changing a method of accounting for advance payments from a method described in Reg. §1.451-5 to another method of accounting[3]. The removal of Reg. §1.451-5 is effective for tax years ending on or after Jul. 15, 2019. 


Code §451(c) generally requires an accrual method taxpayer that receives any advance payment described in IRC §451(c)(4) during the tax year to include the advance payment in income in the tax year of receipt or make an election to:

(1) include any portion of the advance payment in income in the tax year of receipt to the extent required under Code Sec. 451(b); and

(2) include the remaining portion of the advance payment in income in the following tax year.  

Under IRC 451(c)(2) a taxpayer may make a deferral election for any portion of the advance payment that is otherwise required to be included in gross income under financial statement rules.  If the election is made the advance payment would be included in gross income in the tax year in which it is received and the remaining portion of the advance payment would be included in gross income in the tax year following the tax year in which it is received.[4] An item of gross income is received by the taxpayer if it is actually or constructively received, or if it is due and payable to the taxpayer.[5]

Treasury and the IRS expect to issue guidance for the treatment of advance payments to implement the TCJA amendments to IRC §451. In the meantime, taxpayers with or without applicable financial statements may continue to rely on Rev. Proc. 2004-34 for the treatment of advance payments. Until new guidance is issued, the IRS will not challenge a taxpayer’s use of Rev Proc 2004-34 to satisfy the requirements of IRC § 451, although it will continue to verify on examination that taxpayers are properly applying Rev Proc 2004-34[6].

How to elect to defer inclusion of advance payments in income. The IRS is instructed to provide details on making the election to defer the inclusion of advance payments in income. This includes the time, form and manner, and the categories of advance payments. The election will be effective for the tax year with respect to which it is first made and for all subsequent tax years, unless the taxpayer obtains the IRS's consent to revoke the election.[7]

Change of accounting method. The computation of taxable income under the deferral election for advance payments is treated as a method of accounting.[8] In the case of any qualified change of accounting method for the taxpayer's first tax year beginning after December 31, 2017, the change is treated as initiated by the taxpayer and made with the IRS's consent. A qualified change of accounting method is any change of accounting method that is required by the new income recognition rules or was prohibited and is now permitted under the new rules.[9] For a qualified change of accounting method involving income from a debt instrument with original issue discount (OID), taxpayers should use a six-year period for taking into account any required IRC §481 adjustments.[10]

What is an Advance Payment?

Rev. Proc. 2004-34 allows a one-year deferral in certain cases of prepaid income. The ruling pertains to prepayment for services to be rendered before the end of the next succeeding year. In particular, Rev. Proc. 2004-34 provides that a payment received by a taxpayer is an advance payment if:
(1)    the inclusion of the payment in gross income for the taxable year of receipt is a permissible method of accounting for federal income tax purposes;
(2)    the payment is recognized by the taxpayer (in whole or in part) in revenues in the taxpayer's applicable financial statement for a subsequent taxable year or, for taxpayers without an applicable financial statement, the payment is earned by the taxpayer (in whole or in part) in a subsequent taxable year; and
(3)    the payment is for
(a) services;

(b) the sale of goods;

(c) the use (including by license or lease) of intellectual property;

(d) the occupancy or use of property, if the occupancy or use is ancillary to the provision of services (for example, advance payments for the use of rooms or other quarters in a hotel, booth space at a trade show, campsite space at a mobile home park, and recreational or banquet facilities, or other uses of property so long as the use is ancillary to the provision of services to the property user);

(e) the sale, lease, or license of computer software;

(f)  guaranty or warranty contracts ancillary to an item or items described in subparagraph (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e), above;

(g) subscriptions (other than subscriptions for which an election under IRC §455 is in effect), whether or not provided in a tangible or intangible format;

(h) memberships in an organization (other than memberships for which an election under IRC §456 is in effect);

(i)              an eligible gift card sale; or

(j)  any combination of items described in subparagraphs (a) through (i) above.

 What Are Not Advance Payments

Under Rev. Proc. 2004-34, the term “advance payment” does not include:

           Insurance premiums, to the extent the recognition of those premiums are governed by Subchapter L;

           Payments with respect to financial instruments (for example, debt instruments, deposits, letters of credit, notional principal contracts, options, forward contracts, futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, credit card agreements, financial derivatives, etc.), including purported prepayments of interest;

           Payments with respect to service warranty contracts for which the taxpayer uses the accounting method provided in Rev. Proc. 97-38;[11]

           Payments with respect to warranty and guaranty contracts under which a third party is the primary obligor;

           Payments subject to IRC §§871(a), 881, 1441, or 1442;

           Payments in property to which IRC §83 applies;

           Rent; and

           Any other payment identified by the IRS for this purpose.[12]

Advance Payment” Defined Under IRC §451(c)(4)

Under IRC §451(c)(4) an “advance payment” is any payment:[13]
  • the full inclusion of which in the taxpayer’s gross income for the tax year of receipt is a permissible method of accounting under IRC §451 (determined without regard to IRC §451[14];
  • any portion of which is included in revenue by the taxpayer in a financial statement described in IRC §451(b)(1)(A)(i) or IRC §451(b)(1)(A)(ii) for a later tax year[15] and
  • which is for goods, services, or other items as the IRS may identify for these purposes[16].
Except as otherwise provided by the IRS, an advance payment does not include:
  • rent[17];
  • insurance premiums governed by subchapter L (IRC §801 through IRC §848)[18];
  • payments as to financial instruments[19];
  • payments as to warranty or guarantee contracts under which a third party is the primary obligor[20];
  • payments subject to:
    • IRC §871(a) (i.e., the tax on income of nonresident alien individuals not connected with a U.S. business),
    • IRC §881 (i.e., the tax on income of foreign corporations not connected with a U.S. business),
    • IRC §1441 (i.e., the tax withheld on certain amounts paid to foreign persons), or
    • IRC §1442 (i.e., the tax withheld from income of foreign corporations)[21].
  • payments in property to which IRC §83 (taxation of property transferred in connection with the performance of services., and
  • any other payment identified by the IRS for purposes of IRC §451(c)(4)(B)[22].
An item of gross income is received by the taxpayer if it is actually or constructively received, or if it is due and payable to the taxpayer[23].
            Until Treasury issues new guidance regarding advance payment for goods, taxpayer can rely on IRC §451(c)(4) for treatment of advance payments.

           


[1] See Reg. §1.451-5(b)(1)(ii)(a).
[2] See H.R. Rep. No. 115-466, at 429 n.880 (2017) (Conf. Rep.).
[4] IRC §451(c)(1)(B), as added by TCJA.
[5] IRC §451(c) (4)(C), as added by TCJA.
[7] IRC §451(c)(2), as added by TCJA.
[8] IRC §451(c)(2)(B), as added by TCJA.
[9] TCJA §13221(d).
[10] TCJA §13221(e)(2).
[11] 1997-2 CB 479.
[12] IRC §451(c)(4)(B), as added by the TCJA.
[16] IRC § 451(c)(4)(A)(iii).
[18] IRC § 451(c)(4)(B)(ii)
[19] IRC § 451(c)(4)(B)(iii)
[20] IRC § 451(c)(4)(B)(iv)
[21] IRC § 451(c)(4)(B)(v)
[22] IRC § 451(c)(4)(B)(vii)
[23] IRC § 451(c)(4)(C).


Thursday, July 11, 2019

It’s called the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement, or the SECURE Act of 2019.


Let’s take a look.

Good Points-depending on your individual situation.

More time in IRAs and 401(k)s. The bill would push back the age for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from 70½ to 72 years old. With 65,000 baby boomers retiring daily, those who would rather not take their RMD’s and not have them taxed and defer the distribution for two years this is a good feature. Moreover the fund could continue to grow tax free.

Grant part-time workers benefits. Long-term part-time employees would be able to participate in their company’s 401(k) plans.

Boost small-business 401(k)s. Small businesses could band together in group plans.

Annuity adoptions. Would allow employer-sponsored 401(k) plans to add annuities as investment options on the menu.-this feature is favored by insurance companies as providing annuities is a big market.

529 plans. 529 plans would be expanded to pay for expenses related to an apprenticeship or to pay back as much as $10,000 in student loans.

Bad Points-depending on your individual situation.

Age limits
Investors with 401(k) plans or other tax-deferred accounts would have another year and a half before Uncle Sam required withdrawals. Instead of taking money out at 70½, Americans would be able to wait until they turned 72. It gives extra time to grow your investments before you have to start taking money out of your accounts yet take the funds out at a later date would actuarially require larger starting distributions as the time frame for taking the would be less.
To make up for lost tax revenue, the House bill would require Americans who inherit an IRA to withdraw the money within 10 years of the account owner’s death, along with paying any taxes due. Notwithstanding the surviving spouses and minor children would be excluded. Under current law, heirs spend down inherited IRA accounts over their lifetime, an estate-planning strategy known as the “stretch IRA.” The SECURE Act would do away with the stretch IRA. This is a big change and subjects the inherited IRA to income tax at a faster rate. Apparently this was a tradeoff from a revenue perspective to allow a delay in the RMD’s.

Moreover from an estate planning perspective the elimination of the stretch IRA will change the thinking of whether it is better to withdraw the IRA and have it taxed at the (presumably) owner’s lower tax rate and pass on the net to his heirs or maintain the fund, defer, and allow the fund to continue to grow. This will be a new issue for estate planners to consider.

The Senate version, known as RESA, is slightly less punitive and may instead call for a five-year payout period for inherited IRAs over $400,000 per heir.

Other Points
The bill would require your employer’s 401(k)-type retirement plan to allow “permanent” part-time workers to participate. To qualify, you would need to have worked 500 or more hours a year (but fewer than 1,000 hours) for at least three consecutive years. There are 2,080 hours in the traditional 40-hour-a-week year.

401(k) options for small businesses
If House and Senate bills pass and become law, small businesses could have the option to join group plans alongside other companies. This lowers administration and management costs and ideally makes higher-quality plans available to small businesses and their workers.
Current law allows small businesses starting a new retirement plan a $500 tax credit. The SECURE Act bill would increase the credit to as much as $5,000, and apply for three years.

Annuity options, good and bad
The bill would allow 401(k) plans to add annuities as an option for employees.
The idea is that annuities solve the problem of lifetime income for workers who once received pensions. Annuities are insurance policies that convert retirement savings into income. Common in pension plans, annuities to date have not been popular in 401(k) plans.

The House bill would repeal the so-called kiddie tax changes beginning in 2019, although taxpayers could elect to use the old tax rules for 2018 if they wish. This would be a welcome change for those who were surprised by increases in tax under the new tax rules, which subjected those children to the trust tax rates and brackets rather than using their parents’ brackets. This is especially true for college students who received taxable scholarships and `Gold Star’ families, those who are collecting military survivor benefits after losing a parent.

A final positive: The SECURE Act would allow investors early access to IRA funds for any “qualified birth or adoption” by creating a new exception to the 10 percent penalty.

Everyone whether beginning to save for retirement, about to retire, or in retirement needs to periodically examine their retirement account to insure it comports with their current needs.